Skip to main content

Things to do in a coffee shop

Image
By
I’m sat in Café Nero in Fforestfach. I’m drinking coffee and blogging.
I’m watching people sat alone, reading papers, staring into the distance, doing paperwork. I can see the couples sat in silence, and the couples talking. I can see the women in the window seats glued to their smart phones.
Usually, but not today, I watch a group of mothers laughing together with babies in prams, or a group of older women
Earlier today I was part of a talking couple, catching up with my husband. And then we got talking about ‘coffee shop conversations’.
That’s something I do in coffee shops as part of Barod, but not today. And it’s something I’m researching for a PhD.
Imagine, the group of mothers get talking about the local maternity service. A fly on the wall would have a field day learning by listening to them. The fly would hear all sorts of things that weren’t said at the formal consultation on the future of that service.
I did listen in to one of those conversations a few years ago in Holyhead. That’s when I realised what a wealth of problem-solving, insightful knowledge exists which policy makers and service managers don’t tap into.
And the idea for ‘coffee shop conversations’ was born.
It’s a method that lets policy makers learn from members of the public who ‘don’t do engagement’. It’s a method that lets members of public use their voice – you’d be amazed how many wish there was a magic way for ‘important people’ to know what life is like for them without them having to go to a public meeting or fill in a questionnaire. It’s a method that costs very little. And from past experience, it’s a method that leads to a wider group of people taking an interest in public life.
If you want to know what the method involves, how it works and to see one in action, come along on Tuesday 20th September to the Swansea Behaviour Change Festival



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Co-researcher, insider researcher or gatekeeper?

By
What do you call a researcher with learning disabilities? Most people call them a 'co-researcher'. We think that's OK as long everyone doing the research is called a co-researcher. But if you have 'the researcher' working with 'the co-researcher', it's like saying only one of them is a real researcher. We often hear people talking about the researcher and the co-researcher. It's like having a Chair and a Co-chair, rather than two Co-chairs.  That annoys us because if you don't need them both then why have them both in the team? And if you do need them both, why give one a higher status just because the knowledge and experience they bring is different?  So rather than using the term co-researcher, we prefer to say academic researcher and activist researcher. When they do research together we might call them both co-researchers if we need to, but usually we would talk about them co-researching. Researching together is an activity, not an identity
Post a Comment
Read more

Learning Report from the DRILL funded Self Advocacy Toolkit research

By
What Makes a Good Self Advocacy Project: The added value of co-production What this Learning Report is about This is about co-produced research funded by DRILL to define what makes a good self advocacy project and to make an Evaluation Toolkit for self advocates and funders to use.   The five people who did the DRILL funded research together are: ·     two independent academic researchers (Jan, who was subcontracted by All Wales People First, and Bryan, who worked as part of BAROD), ·     two activist researchers (Alan and Simon)  ·     one supporter / technical advisor (Mal). We also had support from Anne Collis, BAROD The four researchers all had equal roles and equal responsibilities.  The Report explains how we all worked together to co-produce the research and the Toolkit. The Report considers what made it possible for co-production to work well. How the Project started This project started with All Wales
Post a Comment
Read more

Swansea really does have jargon busters

By
On Tuesday, we ran a game at the Swansea Behaviour Change Festival. We called it ' Swansea’s Got Jargon*-Busters'. *Jargon: a word or phrase not used in everyday life, or that is being used with a different, special meaning. It often goes with waffling and speaking too fast. We wanted to see if, when faced with a panel of three people with learning difficulties, people could talk for 2 minutes about their job or what they'd learned at the Festival without using jargon. If someone on the panel couldn't understand them easily, they would buzz. Three buzzes and you're out. If you are still going at 2 minutes, you got a rosette saying 'I'm a Jargon Buster'.  Summary People who took part, the panel and the observers were surprised and pleased that people succeeded. Face to face communication is easier than communicating in writing. Jargon is comfortable. You need to know your subject to be able to explain it without jargon. If you find
Post a Comment
Read more